(12 Apr 2017)
(17 Mar 2017)
(11 Mar 2017)
(05 Mar 2017)
(14 Nov 2017)
(09 Oct 2017)
(15 Aug 2017)
(09 Aug 2017)
(12 Jan 2018)
(24 Sep 2016)
Orchids and W.H.Gibson
Second was creating the character of Lord Jacob Risely, a cranky, if eminently eligible, nineteenth century orchid hunter for the novel I've just begun, called Madoc's Bride. And then there was the little issue of the squirrel that found its way into our house, battering a blooming Cymbidium and trashing a perfectly lovely Oncidium that had finally sent up a spike after nearly three years...
Soon, however, I found myself hooked on such passages as:
But on the other hand, if the orchids were able to discuss values, they might possibly place the Corallorhiza higher in the social scale, as the Hindoos would reverence a priest with his begging bowl, where we would see only the exponent of a parasitic system. For the orchids that grace the green houses, those snared like flaming birds from the tops of tropical trees, have all some mysterious power of drawing their nourishment from the air and moisture through the apparent medium of a little bark, or moss; so it may be the creed of these spirit flowers that they should be served rather than serve themselves, and that to delve in mud for their food is unworthy of their kind, and our thrifty Habenarias and Cypripediums that thrust ordinary roots in moist black soil may be thought as much unclassed as a Buddhist who should drive a trade for money.
And then there was Gibson's (not to mention Darwin's and Asa Gray's) apparently completely unselfconscious obsession with plant reproduction, as evidenced in passages such as the following:
To prove the fact that the insects do visit, it is only necessary to count the seed capsules at the end of the summer. But the act, the presence of the winged desire, the actual entrance of the butterfly or moth into the fringed portal, the flying off with the pollen masses sticking by their discs to his eyes and bending forward by their own weight, and his entry to another where they will strike again the viscid stigma just under the column, and send the thrill of creation down the narrow twisted ovary to quicken the waiting ovules - this is a mystery with a key that needs only time and patience and watchful eyes.
William Hamilton Gibson was the product of a distinguished New England family that included the jurist Richard Dana (1699-1772), as well as Richard Henry Dana, Jr., author of Two Years Before the Mast.
A self-taught artist, and friend and stout defender of the embattled Henry Ward Beecher, Gibson made his reputation as an expert illustrator, wood-engraver, and lithographer. His work appeared everywhere from The American Agriculturist to St. Nicholas and Harper's Monthly, where he first established his reputation with his illustrations for Mrs. Helen S. Conant's article on fashion, entitled "Birds and Plumage."
His reputation escalated to the point where John Coleman Adams could begin his 1901 biography of Gibson, "Three men have done more than any others to inspire our generation with the love of nature. They are Henry D. Thoreau, John Burroughs, and William Hamilton Gibson." Adams saw Thoreau is "the Philosopher," Burroughs, "the poet and man of letters," and Gibson "the artist-naturalist," and a triumphant example of the "scientific use of the imagination" - as well as the "imaginative use of science." What this meant to Adams was that Gibson was one who "taught by his art the greatness of the little, the divinity of the familiar." In other words, Gibson was as able to extol the beauties of the Lady's Slipper orchid as those of a swamp or the many varieties of wildflowers he found growing as weeds in his Brooklyn back yard.
He did this in his pictures as well as his words, illustrations so exact that Gibson was often accused of tracing his engravings from photographs. In fact, however, he never worked directly from nature, preferring instead to make sketches and then elaborate his engraving from them. In Adams' words, Gibson was like the impressionists in that he painted only what he saw. The irony was that Gibson saw so much more than the impressionists did.
This "seeing" often took on a visionary, if not absolutely supernatural, character - a near shamanic "acquaintance of all living things," that allowed Gibson to calmly pluck a little brown bird out of a tree, to illustrate a point he was making about its plumage to Dr. Lyman Abbott, and then returning it, quite literally unruffled, to its branch. "We are accustomed to think of those saints whose communion is close with God that they sit and meditate or kneel and pray," Wilson's pastor, Mr. Turner summed up this ability. "Perhaps we do not conceive of walking with God as one would walk with the owner of a great estate, and hear him tell what he has done or meant to do with this field or that." Shades of Downton Abbey to be sure. But a purely American, completely democratic Downton Abbey, whose gates magazine writers like Gibson threw open to any who might want to visit.